Brookfield’s Defense is Cartoonishly Silly
In Stuart v. Brookfield Properties, the tenant alleges that Brookfield fabricated a debt in retaliation after he reported years of unexplained annual overcharges—these charges appeared without explanation and then quietly disappeared months later. Brookfield’s defense relies on procedural arguments and shifting explanations. It’s cartoonishly silly as illustrated below. Brookfield Properties argues that the disputed debt they … Read more